Schistosomiasis japonicum diagnosed on liver biopsy in a patient with hepatitis B co-infection: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic hepatitis B virus and schistosomiasis are independently associated with significant mortality and morbidity worldwide. Despite much geographic overlap between these conditions and no reason why co-infection should not exist, we present what is, to the best of our knowledge, the first published report of a proven histological diagnosis of hepatic Schistosomiasis japonicum and chronic hepatitis B co-infection. A single case of hepatitis B and hepatic Schistosomiasis mansoni diagnosed by liver biopsy has previously been reported in the literature. CASE PRESENTATION: A 38-year-old Chinese man with known chronic hepatitis B virus infection presented with malaise, nausea and headache. Blood tests revealed increased transaminases and serology in keeping with hepatitis B virus e-antigen seroconversion. A liver biopsy was performed because some investigations, particularly transient elastography, suggested cirrhosis. Two schistosome ova were seen on liver histology, identified as S. japonicum, probably acquired in China as a youth. His peripheral eosinophil count was normal, schistosomal serology and stool microscopy for ova, cysts and parasites were negative. CONCLUSION: Hepatic schistosomiasis co-infection should be considered in patients with hepatitis B virus infection who are from countries endemic for schistosomiasis. Screening for schistosomiasis using a peripheral eosinophil count, schistosomal serology and stool microscopy may be negative despite infection, therefore presumptive treatment could be considered. Transient elastography should not be used to assess liver fibrosis during acute flares of viral hepatitis because readings are falsely elevated. The impact of hepatic schistosomiasis on the sensitivity and specificity of transient elastography measurement for the assessment of hepatitis B is as yet unknown.

Low prevalence of transmitted antiretroviral drug resistance in a large UK HIV-1 cohort.

OBJECTIVES: To describe current practice in testing for transmitted antiretroviral drug resistance (TDR) and the prevalence of TDR in a large UK HIV-1 cohort. METHODS: The study includes a retrospective analysis of newly diagnosed HIV-1-infected patients presenting to eight HIV clinics in the north of England between March 2005 and March 2007. Resistance mutations were defined by IAS-USA. Predicted phenotypes were calculated by the Stanford University database. RESULTS: Five hundred and fifty-eight patients were studied, of whom 394 (70.6%) had heterosexually acquired HIV and 377 (67.6%) were infected outside the UK. TDR testing was performed in 406 patients (72.8%). Thirteen of 392 viral resistance profiles (3.3%) showed genotypic TDR. There was no significant association between TDR and any demographic or risk factor or baseline CD4 count. In particular, rates of TDR were similar in white British (6/147, 4.1%) and black African (7/224, 3.1%) patients. The numbers of patients with TDR to individual drug classes were: nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, 2 (0.5%); non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, 7 (1.8%); and protease inhibitors, 4 (1.0%). No patients had multi-class resistance detected. Eleven patients (2.8%) were predicted to have significant phenotypic resistance to at least one drug. CONCLUSIONS: In a large unselected UK cohort, with high coverage of TDR testing, the prevalence of TDR was low and is in accordance with recent data, showing a decrease in the prevalence of TDR in the UK. Differences in population mix did not appear to explain this low rate.